Cost Structure & Sourcing Guide: Injection Molding & Custom Products & Product Sourcing
At FMS, we leverage a transparent, data-driven cost-analysis framework aligned with Western procurement standards (Total Cost of Ownership – TCO). Whether you are sourcing a new custom program, transferring existing tooling, or benchmarking, this guide outlines how we calculate value and optimize costs for your project.
1. Tooling (Injection Mold) Cost Analysis
We break down tool costs using standard Value Engineering (VE) metrics to ensure long-term ROI based on your SPI Class requirements.
Total Tooling Cost =Material & Components + Engineering & Design + Machining & Labor + Validation (Tryouts) + Margin + Export Logistics
Typical Tooling Cost Allocation:
• Materials & Standard Components (15% – 30%): Includes mold base (e.g., LKM) and premium core/cavity steel (e.g., ASSAB, Finkl, Schmiedewerke Gröditz) based on volume requirements (SPI Class 101/102). Standard components utilize global brands (e.g., DME, HASCO, YUDO, Mastip).
• Machining, Processing & Overhead (30% – 50%): Precision CNC, EDM, wire cutting, and skilled toolmaker labor.
• Engineering & Mold Design (10% – 15%): DFM (Design for Manufacturability), Mold flow analysis, and 3D CAD modeling.
• Mold Validation & Tryouts (3% – 5%): T0 to T2 sampling, CMM dimensional inspection, and scientific molding validation.
• Packaging & Export Logistics (approx. 3%): ISPM-15 compliant sea/air-worthy wooden crating and anti-rust treatment.
• Note on Taxes: For direct export, Pricing is provided on an FOB, FCA, or DDP basis excluding domestic VAT.
To accelerate your program’s Time-to-Market (TTM) and secure the most competitive, accurate quotation, please provide the following variables in your RFQ:
A. Technical & Data Requirements
• 3D CAD Data: Preferred formats: .STEP, .IGS, .X_T. 2D control drawings (.PDF, .DWG) indicating critical-to-quality (CTQ) dimensions and tolerances.
• Resin Specifications: Exact grade/brand (e.g., Sabic Lexan Polycarbonate) or performance equivalent requests (UL94 flame rating, UV stabilization, FDA compliance).
B. Life-Cycle Volume & Supply Chain Strategy
• EAU (Estimated Annual Volume): This dictates whether we propose a single-cavity prototype tool (aluminum soft steel) or a high-cavity, fully hardened hot-runner production tool (SPI Class 101) to lower your piece-part cost.
• Release Quantities (MOQ): Do you pull in batches of 5,000, or the full 20,000 at once? Batch sizes impact setup amortization and material purchasing power.
C. Program Timeline & Milestones
• T1 Sample Approval Date: When do your design and quality teams need parts for fit/form/function testing?
• SOP (Start of Production): Target date for commercial volume shipments.
D. Aesthetic & Functional Criteria
• Surface Finish: SPI/MT (Mold-Tech) textures, high-gloss polishing, or specific color matching (Pantone/RAL).
• Gate & Parting Line Restrictions: Advise on non-cosmetic zones to ensure gate locations do not interfere with assembly or industrial design.
your quality control process is very good
your idea about quality is very correct
different product requires different quality control process
the technology level of your quality engineer is the most important part
you have a good quality control idea
we need to learn quality control experience from your team.
your ideal on quality control is very good
quality contol system is very important for a mold company.
it seems that you have Precise measuring equipments and tools
every mold company needs a good quality control system